2023财年吉尔吉斯共和国国家意见调查报告（英）

October 2023FY 2023 Kyrgyz RepublicCountry Opinion Survey ReportECR Business Intelligence TeamPublic Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure AuthorizededAcknowledgementsThe Kyrgyz Republic Country Opinion Survey is part of the County Opinion Survey Program series of the World Bank. This report was prepared by the Business Intelligence (BI) team, led by José De Buerba (Senior External Affairs Officer) and Svetlana Markova (Senior External Affairs Officer). Yulia Danilina, Jessica Cameron, Nan Lin, and Sofya Gubaydullina oversaw the design, reporting, and analysis of the survey results. Noreen Wambui and Irina Popova provided data support. BI acknowledges the significant contribution from the Kyrgyz Republic Country Team and the independent field agency, Elpikir. In particular, the BI team is grateful for the support from Jyldyz Djakypova (External Affairs Officer) and Natalya Iosipenko (Senior Program Assistant) who coordinated the survey-related activities from Bishkek, the Kyrgyz Republic.ObjectivesOverall Context World Bank Group’s Support for Development AreasOverall Attitudes Toward the World Bank Group World Bank Group’s Work and Engagement on the Ground World Bank Group’s Knowledge Work and Activities The Future Role of the World Bank Group in the Kyrgyz Republic Communications and Outreach Sample DemographicsMethodology Contents3Objectives4This survey was designed to assist the World Bank Group (WBG) in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in the Kyrgyz Republic perceive the WBG. The survey explored the following questions: 1. Overall Context: How do stakeholders perceive the country’s direction? How familiar are they with the WBG? How much do they trust the WBG?2. Key Indicators: What opinion do key stakeholders have of the WBG when it comes to its effectiveness, relevance, alignment with the development priorities of the Kyrgyz Republic, and other key indicators? Are opinions improving or declining?3. Development Priorities: What areas of development are perceived to be the most important? Have the priorities changed over the past three years? How effective is the WBG perceived to be in these areas?4. Engagement and Work on the Ground: What do key stakeholders value the most and the least when it comes to the WBG’s work in the Kyrgyz Republic? How is the WBG perceived as a development partner? Are opinions improving or declining?5. Financial Instruments and Knowledge Work: What opinion do key stakeholders have of the WBG financial instruments and knowledge products? Are opinions improving or declining? What are stakeholders’ suggestions to improve WBG’s effectiveness?6. Communication and Outreach: What are the preferred communication channels and which channels are reported to be used the most? Are there differences among stakeholder groups in terms of preferred channels? 7. Message Recall: What key topics that the WBG communicates do stakeholders recall? Is there a relationship between messag