美国货币政策对中东和中亚的影响:冲击、基本面和传播(英)

IMF Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to encourage debate. The views expressed in IMF Working Papers are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, its Executive Board, or IMF management. 2024JANU.S. Monetary Policy Spillovers to Middle East and Central Asia: Shocks, Fundamentals, and Propagations Giovanni Ugazio and Weining Xin WP24/14* We would like to thank Nordine Abidi, Abdullah AlHassan, Michal Andrle, Vassili Bazinas, Lukas Boer, Asmaa El-Ganainy, Fozan Fareed, Gianluigi Ferrucci, Thomas Krone, Fei Liu, Amine Mati, Zeine Zeidane, Tianxiao Zhang, andparticipants at the Middle East and Central Asia and Asia Pacific departmental seminars for helpful suggestions. Allerrors are our own.© 2024 International Monetary Fund WP/24/14IMF Working Paper Middle East and Central Asia Department U.S. Monetary Policy Spillovers to Middle East and Central Asia: Shocks, Fundamentals and Propagations Prepared by Giovanni Ugazio and Weining Xin* Authorized for distribution by Amine Mati January 2024IMF Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to encourage debate. The views expressed in IMF Working Papers are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, its Executive Board, or IMF management. ABSTRACT: We empirically examine U.S. monetary policy spillovers to the Middle East and Central Asia (ME & CA) region by decomposing U.S. interest rates changes into two orthogonal shocks: the pure monetary policy shock and the information news shock. Using a sample of 16 ME & CA countries, we find that when interest rates increase, the two shocks have opposite spillovers on the region. Tightening driven by contractionary monetary policy shocks hinders growth, while tightening driven by positive information news shocks boosts growth despite higher interest rates. Countries with weaker fundamentals face more negative spillovers from contractionary monetary policy shocks but may sometimes benefit more from positive information news shocks. Moreover, high oil prices mitigate both spillovers for oil exporters while global risk appetite amplifies both spillovers. Finally, we estimate a large degree of heterogeneity in the impact of the 2022 U.S. tightening cycle on ME & CA countries, with oil exporters with stronger fundamentals withstanding well the shock and oil importers with weaker fundamentals being hit the most. RECOMMENDED CITATION: Ugazio, Giovanni, and Weining Xin (2024), “U.S. Monetary Policy Spillovers to Middle East and Central Asia: Shocks, Fundamentals and Propagations”, IMF Working Paper 24/14JEL Classification Numbers: F4; E5; C3. Keywords: U.S. monetary policy; spillovers; fundamentals; oil prices Author’s E-Mail Address: GUgazio@imf.org and WXin@imf.org WORKING PAPERS U.S. Monetary Policy Spillovers to Middle East and Central Asia: Shocks, Fundamentals, and Propa

立即下载
金融
2024-02-03
IMF
37页
1.96M
收藏
分享

[IMF]:美国货币政策对中东和中亚的影响:冲击、基本面和传播(英),点击即可下载。报告格式为PDF,大小1.96M,页数37页,欢迎下载。

本报告共37页,只提供前10页预览,清晰完整版报告请下载后查看,喜欢就下载吧!
立即下载
本报告共37页,只提供前10页预览,清晰完整版报告请下载后查看,喜欢就下载吧!
立即下载
水滴研报所有报告均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
相关图表
历史上不同总统和国会归属时期的美股表现对比
金融
2024-02-03
来源:2024美国大选系列之一:美国大选的6个关键问题
查看原文
美股通常在大选前 2-3 个月经历调整,选情焦灼则更早 图表 22:现任总统连任失败后美股往往表现更好
金融
2024-02-03
来源:2024美国大选系列之一:美国大选的6个关键问题
查看原文
连任选举年美股表现往往好于非连任选举年 图表 20:选情焦灼时美股表现往往较差
金融
2024-02-03
来源:2024美国大选系列之一:美国大选的6个关键问题
查看原文
2020 年大选由于计票暂停导致结果异动
金融
2024-02-03
来源:2024美国大选系列之一:美国大选的6个关键问题
查看原文
2024 年与 2020 年相比,半数摇摆州提高了投票门槛
金融
2024-02-03
来源:2024美国大选系列之一:美国大选的6个关键问题
查看原文
美国邮寄选票在 2020 年暴增 图表 16:投给拜登的邮寄选票远高于特朗普
金融
2024-02-03
来源:2024美国大选系列之一:美国大选的6个关键问题
查看原文
回顶部
报告群
公众号
小程序
在线客服
收起