Crowstrike_网络安全领域AI状况调研

STATE OF AIIN CYBERSECURITY SURVEYCrowdStrike commissioned a survey of over 1,000 cybersecurity professionals to learn their thoughts on GenAI 2CROWDSTRIKE STATE OF AI IN CYBERSECURITY SURVEYTable of Contents How Your Peers Are Thinking about GenAI 3Top 5 Takeaways 4Survey Methodology 5KEY FINDING 1: A Platform-Based Approach Is Preferred 6KEY FINDING 2: Security Teams Want GenAI Built by Cybersecurity Experts 8KEY FINDING 3: The Robots Will Augment Us, Not Replace Us 9KEY FINDING 4: Measurable ROI Is More Important than Cost 10KEY FINDING 5: Guardrails Are Required for Safe and Responsible Adoption 11In Summary 12CrowdStrike’s Approach to Generative AI 13About CrowdStrike 14CROWDSTRIKE STATE OF AI IN CYBERSECURITY SURVEY 3How Your Peers Are Thinking about GenAIThe pressure is mounting for security teams. As adversaries become faster and stealthier, security teams must adapt to stay ahead.The emergence of generative AI (GenAI) has the potential to help them do just that. With its unique capabilities for natural language processing and synthesizing large amounts of data, GenAI can help security teams improve data awareness across silos and operate their security tools with greater proficiency. Many security leaders recognize its potential, with some going so far as to mandate AI adoption across their operations.At the same time, the hype has reached a fever pitch. The avalanche of conversation and content about GenAI has made it hard for security teams to understand what’s possible and what’s not. Misconceptions abound.To help organizations navigate this uncertainty, CrowdStrike surveyed over 1,000 global cybersecurity leaders and practitioners on their key criteria shaping GenAI adoption, perceptions of current GenAI offerings and overall sentiment on GenAI.With speculation swirling in the market, this survey reveals how security teams are actually thinking about GenAI — and the results might surprise you.CROWDSTRIKE STATE OF AI IN CYBERSECURITY SURVEY 4Top 5 Takeaways12345Security teams want a platform-based approach 80% of respondents prefer GenAI delivered through a cybersecurity platform (versus a point solution).GenAI must be purpose-built for cybersecurity 76% of respondents prefer GenAI tools purpose-built for cybersecurity, as opposed to domain-agnostic tools. It’s about augmentation, not replacement Respondents overwhelmingly believe GenAI will ultimately optimize the analyst experience, not replace human labor.Measurable ROI is a top priority The top economic concern about GenAI isn’t about cost — it’s about providing a measurable ROI.Safety and privacy remain top concerns Wary of GenAI risks, users ranked safety and privacy guardrails among the top features they want to see in GenAI tools. 5CROWDSTRIKE STATE OF AI IN CYBERSECURITY SURVEYSurvey MethodologyCrowdStrike worked with research firm ViB to survey 1,022 global cybersecurity and IT professionals in June and July 2024. Questions centered on perceptions, attitudes and concerns tow