世界银行-2025财年秘鲁国家意见调查报告（英）

FY 2025 PeruCountry Opinion Survey ReportECR Business Intelligence Team | November 2025Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure AuthorizedAcknowledgementsThe Peru Country Opinion Survey is part of the Country Opinion Survey Program series of the World Bank Group. This report was prepared by the Business Intelligence (BI) team, led by José De Buerba (Senior External Affairs Officer) and Svetlana Markova (Senior External Affairs Officer). Yulia Danilina, Jessica Cameron, Qi Xue, and Sofya Gubaydullina oversaw the design, reporting, and analysis of the survey results. Irina Popova and Noreen Wambui provided data support. BI acknowledges the significant contribution from the Peru country team and the independent field agency, IPSOS Peru. In particular, BI is grateful for the support from Pablo Andres Rivero Morales (Senior External Affairs Officer) and Alexandra Sears (Program Assistant), who coordinated the survey-related activities from Lima, Peru.ContentsObjectivesMethodology OverviewExecutive Summary Overall Views of the World Bank Group (WBG)The WBG’s Work on Development PrioritiesThe WBG’s InstrumentsThe WBG’s Engagement and CollaborationCommunication and OutreachSample Demographics and Detailed Methodology3ObjectivesThis survey was designed to assist the World Bank Group (WBG) in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in Peru perceive the WBG. The survey explored the following questions: 1.Overall Views of the WBG: How familiar are stakeholders with the WBG? How much do they trust the WBG? What opinions do stakeholders have of the WBG regarding its effectiveness and relevance to development in Peru? Are these perceptions improving or declining? Do stakeholders feel that the WBG has changed for the better or the worse in the last two years?2.The WBG’s Work on Development Priorities: What areas of development are perceived to be the most important? Has the WBG helped achieve the goals of its projects in these areas? How do respondents perceive its operational effectiveness? How did these projects impact the people of Peru, and what could the WBG have done to be more helpful?3.WBG Instruments: What do key stakeholders value the most regarding the WBG’s work in Peru? What opinion do key stakeholders have of WBG’s financial instruments and knowledge products? How are stakeholders using WBG knowledge work, and has it influenced government policy in Peru? 4.The WBG’s Engagement and Collaboration: How is the WBG perceived as a development partner in Peru? Are opinions improving or declining? How effective has the WBG been in facilitating the Government’s engagement with civil society? 5.Communications: What are the preferred communication channels, and do they differ between stakeholder groups? Do stakeholders recall any WBG messaging? What key topics do stakeholders recall? What information do stakeholders want from the WBG?4QMethodology OverviewFielded in April – June 2025▪1351 potential participants