中国《公众对水产动物福利的认知调查报告》

Webinar prepared for:Public attitudes towards aquatic animal welfareOctober 2024Survey prepared for: 1. Background & research designResearch design & sample3To answer the research questions, an online surveyof ± 12 minutes was designed, which 12 301 respondents from 12 different countries completed. The fieldwork ran from March 20th to April 5th 2024. Data were weighted in each country to be nationally representative by age, gender and region.This report highlights the results from China.The 12 countries included: China, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Poland, Spain, Sweden, The Netherlands, United Kingdom, USAPlease note that due to rounding, percentages on some graphs may add up to 101%, and the top-2 scores may differ by 1% from the actual underlying scores.Questionnaire4The questionnaire consisted of the following topics:-Background-Attitudes Towards Animals-Importance & Awareness of Aquatic Animal Welfare-Consumption Habits & Behaviour-Welfare Labelling-Socio demo & Profiling2. Results2.1 Attitudes Towards Animals7Most people agree that fish can feel pain. There is more doubt on the emotional/intelligence statements, though the trend is positive.“Q5. To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements?” Don't knowStrongly disagreeTend to disagreeTend to agreeStrongly agree* This statement was negated in the questionnaire (i.e. ‘Fish do not feel pain’/’Fish are not intelligent’). For the sake of uniform interpretation, the statement is reversed here in the report.4%10%10%8%10%14%27%28%20%19%45%41%44%48%42%37%19%17%23%27%0%100%69%71%61%60%82%Top-2 %(tend to/strongly agree)Fish feel pain*Fish feel negative emotions, e.g., fearFish are intelligent*Fish feel positive emotions, e.g., pleasure Fish are sentient2.2 Importance & Awareness of Aquatic Animal Welfare15%13%76%65%9%21%0%20%40%60%80%100%lesser extentsame extentgreater extent9Most people believe we should protect the welfare of fish just like we do for other animals we eat.“Q4. Which of the following comes closest to your view? The welfare of fish should be protected to a greater/a lesser/the same extent than the welfare of other animals we eat.” 87%85%Top-2 %(same/greater extent)10This conviction drives widespread advocacy for enacting stricter legislation regarding the welfare of aquatic animals.4%5%2%3%1%2%4%4%17%18%13%14%11%50%45%53%56%54%28%28%28%24%32%0%100%prohibits the introduction of new carnivorous species intofarming, because feeding them involves the unsustainable useof resources?prohibits farmers from feeding farmed fish with wild-caught fishthat could otherwise be eaten by humans?requires farmers to stun (make unconscious) aquatic animalsbefore slaughter?guarantees high welfare during the transport of live crustaceans(e.g., crabs, lobsters)?requires the use of best practices and the latest science to meetthe welfare needs of farmed aquatic animals?86%79%81%73%78%“Q7. Would you support or oppose legislation that…” I don’t knowStrongly

立即下载
综合
2024-11-18
23页
3.15M
收藏
分享

中国《公众对水产动物福利的认知调查报告》,点击即可下载。报告格式为PDF,大小3.15M,页数23页,欢迎下载。

本报告共23页,只提供前10页预览,清晰完整版报告请下载后查看,喜欢就下载吧!
立即下载
本报告共23页,只提供前10页预览,清晰完整版报告请下载后查看,喜欢就下载吧!
立即下载
回顶部
报告群
公众号
小程序
在线客服
收起