Capgemini-按需技术悖论:平衡速度和支出(英)

The On-Demand tech paradox: Balancing speed and spend#GetTheFutureYouWantThe on-demand tech paradoxBalancing speed and spendTable of contents2Capgemini Research Institute 2025The On-Demand tech paradox: Balancing speed and spendWho should read this report and why? 04Executive summary05On-Demand tech spending is on the rise — and driving impact12Organizations struggle to harness On-Demand tech 183Capgemini Research Institute 2025The On-Demand tech paradox: Balancing speed and spendManaging the cost of On-Demand tech 36Optimizing costs and elevating the value of On-Demand Tech52Conclusion74Research methodology75Who should read this report and why?The economics of On-Demand technologies focuses on controlling costs and maximizing value from cloud services, software-as-a-service (SaaS), and generative AI (Gen AI). Transparency and control over operational expenditure (OpEx) are critical. The evolution from cloud FinOps to On-Demand consumption FinOps demands a holistic approach to cost management that will drive efficiency, reduce total cost of ownership (TCO) and carbon emissions, and unlock greater value from every digital investment and operational decision.How can we optimize cloud spend without compromising AI performance or innovation? And what is the true cost of scaling AI workloads in the cloud? And how do we measure ROI for increasing Gen AI adoption and siloed SaaS spending across functions? On-Demand tech is here to stay, so how can organizations optimize implementation?This report will attempt to answer these questions. It will be highly useful to stakeholders across technology, finance, business, and FinOps functions. CFOs, COOs, CIOs, CTOs, business unit heads, and FinOps heads will find insights that support strategic decision-making, financial agility, cloud cost optimization and value enablement. The report draws on comprehensive analysis of the results of a survey of 1,000 leadership executives (CXOs, vice presidents, and directors) at organizations with annual revenue above $1 billion in 14 countries: Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, the UK, and the US. The survey spans 12 key industries and sectors: aerospace and defense, automotive, life sciences, manufacturing, consumer products, retail, energy and utilities, telecom, high tech, banking and capital markets, insurance, and the public sector. The report also includes qualitative findings from 10 industry leaders.4Capgemini Research Institute 2025The On-Demand tech paradox: Balancing speed and spendExecutive summary On-Demand tech is gaining traction and unlocking benefits As digital transformation accelerates, organizations are increasingly adopting On-Demand technologies such as cloud, software-as-a-service (SaaS), and Gen AI. These serve to scale innovation, improve agility, and support competitiveness. Our global survey of 1,000 organizations, each with over $1 billion in annual revenue, reveals that 77%

立即下载
综合
2025-09-22
92页
7.61M
收藏
分享

Capgemini-按需技术悖论:平衡速度和支出(英),点击即可下载。报告格式为PDF,大小7.61M,页数92页,欢迎下载。

本报告共92页,只提供前10页预览,清晰完整版报告请下载后查看,喜欢就下载吧!
立即下载
本报告共92页,只提供前10页预览,清晰完整版报告请下载后查看,喜欢就下载吧!
立即下载
水滴研报所有报告均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
相关图表
图1-6 供热价格定价机制
综合
2025-09-22
来源:低碳供热技术价格机制研究——以居民热价为例
查看原文
人工智能应用模型
综合
2025-09-22
来源:全球数智化指数(GDII)2025
查看原文
表 5 | 中国企业在海外本土化运营阶段
综合
2025-09-22
来源:2025年中国对外绿地投资:从“走出去”到“走进去”,深入本土化运营报告-毕马威
查看原文
图 18 | 美国州政府对投资提供的激励政策
综合
2025-09-22
来源:2025年中国对外绿地投资:从“走出去”到“走进去”,深入本土化运营报告-毕马威
查看原文
图 17 | 美国不同区域的投资激励政策程度
综合
2025-09-22
来源:2025年中国对外绿地投资:从“走出去”到“走进去”,深入本土化运营报告-毕马威
查看原文
图 16 | 选址过程的深入分析
综合
2025-09-22
来源:2025年中国对外绿地投资:从“走出去”到“走进去”,深入本土化运营报告-毕马威
查看原文
回顶部
报告群
公众号
小程序
在线客服
收起