IMF-博茨瓦纳：公共部门债务统计团数据质量评估技术援助报告（2025年5月14日至20日）（英）

BOTSWANA Report on Data Quality Assessment for Public Sector Debt Statistics Mission (May 14–20, 2025) AUGUST 2025 Prepared By Andrew Kitili (mission chief) and Bruno Rocha TECHNICAL REPORT Authoring Department: Statistics Department DISCLAIMER “The contents of this document constitute technical advice provided by the staff of the International Monetary Fund to the authorities of Botswana (the "CD recipient") in response to their request for technical assistance. This document (in whole or in part) or summaries thereof may be disclosed by the IMF to the IMF Executive Director for Botswana, to other IMF Executive Directors and members of their staff, as well as to other agencies or instrumentalities of the CD recipient, and upon their request, to World Bank staff, and other technical assistance providers and donors with legitimate interest unless the CD recipient specifically objects to such disclosure (see Operational Guidance for the Dissemination of Capacity Development Information). Publication or Disclosure of this report (in whole or in part) to parties outside the IMF other than agencies or instrumentalities of the CD recipient, World Bank staff, other technical assistance providers and donors with legitimate interest shall require the explicit consent of the CD recipient and the IMF’s Statistics department.” PARTNERS IMF | Technical Report – Botswana Data Quality Assessment for PSDS | 1 Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... 2 Overall Assessment ............................................................................................................................................ 3  Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 3  Background .................................................................................................................................... 3  Summary Findings and Recommendations ................................................................................... 4  Priority recommendations .............................................................................................................. 7 Detailed Assessment and Recommendations ............................................................................................ 12 A. Prerequisites of quality ..................................................................................................................... 12 B. Assurances of integrity ..................................................................................................................... 15 C. Methodological Soundness .............................................................................................................. 16 D. Accuracy and Reliability ............................