未来能源研究所-废除美国环保署碳污染标准的隐性成本:对环境、家庭和社会的影响(英)

Hidden Costs of Repealing EPA’s Carbon Pollution Standards: Consequences for the Environment, Households, and SocietyIssue Brief 25-10 by Nicholas Roy and Karen Palmer — August 2025On June 11, 2025, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed a repeal of the existing Greenhouse Gas Standards and Guidelines for Fossil-Fired Power Plants, hereafter referred to as the Carbon Pollution Standards (CPS). EPA’s repeal is part of the new administration’s deregulatory agenda for the US power sector, whose stated goals are to lower costs and to meet rising electricity demand. The proposed repeal would lead to measurable changes in outcomes for the nation’s electric power sector, especially when assessed in conjunction with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) and updated electricity demand forecasts. Policymakers and the public alike are paying attention to the action’s likely result of slowing US greenhouse gas emission reductions. In this issue brief, we consider the economic costs of the greenhouse gas emissions unabated due to this repeal and evaluate other costs and benefits for the US population from the proposed repeal using updated data. Indeed, according to our analysis: if the EPA conducted a cost-benefit analysis using updated electricity demand projections and including the electricity tax credit changes from the OBBBA, then the repeal of the CPS would fail a traditional cost-benefit test—even without factoring in the increase in greenhouse gas emissions. With the repeal of the CPS, US residents will likely see:• Increases in coal generation of 169–456 TWh by 2040, or 4.8–8.7 times as much coal generation as was expected with the regulations in place. • An increase in cumulative CO2 emissions from the power sector by 1.2–5.8 gigatons by 2050.• A net increase of 2.1–3.3 percent annually in national average electricity prices from now to 2050. This combines the 1–1.4 percent decrease from CPS repeal with the OBBBA increases of 3.3–4.7 percent over the same period. • Net increases in average net household electricity costs of $67–$97 per year in the 2030s, driven by the CPS’s decreases of $19–$24 annually and the OBBBA’s increases of $87–$121 annually over the same time period. However, CPS repeal savings for households increase in the 2040s to $34–$44 annually on average per household over the decade due to coal plants remaining online. • Increases in health damages that exceed the savings from lower compliance costs. The climate and health damages from this regulatory repeal will be 4–8 times the savings from reduced compliance costs across the modeled sensitivities. Considering solely the health effects along with the power sector’s financial outcomes, there is a total net cost of $128.9 billion (2024 US dollars) through 2050 to US society in our central case. 1. Modeling and Regulatory ContextEPA’s 2025 Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) of the proposed rule to repeal the CPS repurposes analysis from 2024 that justified the origi

立即下载
化石能源
2025-08-18
9页
0.52M
收藏
分享

未来能源研究所-废除美国环保署碳污染标准的隐性成本:对环境、家庭和社会的影响(英),点击即可下载。报告格式为PDF,大小0.52M,页数9页,欢迎下载。

本报告共9页,只提供前10页预览,清晰完整版报告请下载后查看,喜欢就下载吧!
立即下载
本报告共9页,只提供前10页预览,清晰完整版报告请下载后查看,喜欢就下载吧!
立即下载
水滴研报所有报告均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
相关图表
曹妃甸港煤炭库存变动情况(单位:万吨) 图表 14:京唐港煤炭库存变动情况(单位:万吨)
化石能源
2025-08-18
来源:电力行业:甘肃发布136号文承接,存量项目机制电价0.3078元/度
查看原文
8 月 8 日-8 月 15 日电力及公用事业表现最好及最差公司(单位:%)
化石能源
2025-08-18
来源:电力行业:甘肃发布136号文承接,存量项目机制电价0.3078元/度
查看原文
电力及公用事业行业 PB 水平为 1.8
化石能源
2025-08-18
来源:电力行业:甘肃发布136号文承接,存量项目机制电价0.3078元/度
查看原文
电力及公用事业行业一致预期市盈率 18 倍
化石能源
2025-08-18
来源:电力行业:甘肃发布136号文承接,存量项目机制电价0.3078元/度
查看原文
8 月 1 日-8 月 8 日火电、水电、燃气板块涨跌幅分别为 2.41%、-0.28%、3.64%
化石能源
2025-08-18
来源:电力行业:甘肃发布136号文承接,存量项目机制电价0.3078元/度
查看原文
2025 年初至今电力板块下跌 1.24 个百分点,沪深 300 指数上涨 6.80%
化石能源
2025-08-18
来源:电力行业:甘肃发布136号文承接,存量项目机制电价0.3078元/度
查看原文
回顶部
报告群
公众号
小程序
在线客服
收起