国际清算银行-ETF作为一种纪律手段(英)

BIS Working Papers No 1261 ETFs as a disciplinary device by Yuet Chau, Karamfil Todorov and Eyub Yegen Monetary and Economic Department April 2025 JEL classification: G10, G11, G12, G20, G23 Keywords: ETF, mutual funds, performance, flow, active fund management BIS Working Papers are written by members of the Monetary and Economic Department of the Bank for International Settlements, and from time to time by other economists, and are published by the Bank. The papers are on subjects of topical interest and are technical in character. The views expressed in them are those of their authors and not necessarily the views of the BIS. This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). © Bank for International Settlements 2025. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is stated. ISSN 1020-0959 (print) ISSN 1682-7678 (online) ETFs as a disciplinary device∗Yuet Chau†Karamfil Todorov‡Eyub Yegen§December 21, 2024AbstractWe document a novel feature of active exchange-traded funds (AETFs): they serveas a disciplinary tool for investors to remove underperforming portfolio managers.Unlike mutual fund shares, ETF shares can be shorted, which enables investorsto bet against manager performance. We show that AETFs exhibit over five timesgreater flow-performance sensitivity than mutual funds, indicating that AETF man-agers face harsher penalties for poor performance. When an underperforming man-ager joins an AETF, investors respond by shorting more shares of the fund. Conse-quently, this manager is more likely to exit the fund management industry, therebyenhancing overall sector efficiency and allowing more high-performing managers toremain. Moreover, the stocks held within AETFs exhibit improved price informa-tiveness. We also find that AETF managers outperform both mutual fund andpassive fund managers. In summary, the short-selling feature of AETFs serves asa disciplining device and enhances market efficiency by facilitating the removal ofunderperforming managers.JEL classification: G10, G11, G12, G20, G23.Keywords: ETF, Mutual Funds, Performance, Flow, Active Fund Management∗The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent thoseof the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). For helpful comments and discussions, we are gratefulto seminar participants at BIS, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Chinese University ofHong Kong, York University, and St. Gallen Financial Economics Workshop.†Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. Email: yuet.chau@connect.ust.hk‡Bank for International Settlements. Email: karamfil.todorov@bis.org§Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. Email: yegen@ust.hk1Introduction“Short sellers have ramped up bets against Cathie Wood’s flagship Ark innovationfund as belief in its [active] strategy shows signs of faltering. A record 12 per centof the ARKK exchange traded fund’s

立即下载
金融
2025-05-07
63页
1.83M
收藏
分享

国际清算银行-ETF作为一种纪律手段(英),点击即可下载。报告格式为PDF,大小1.83M,页数63页,欢迎下载。

本报告共63页,只提供前10页预览,清晰完整版报告请下载后查看,喜欢就下载吧!
立即下载
本报告共63页,只提供前10页预览,清晰完整版报告请下载后查看,喜欢就下载吧!
立即下载
水滴研报所有报告均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
相关图表
图 15、不同价格个券转股溢价率中位数变动(%)
金融
2025-05-07
来源:金融工程定期报告:转债市场债性为主,反弹力度弱于权益
查看原文
图 13、不同价格个券数量构成 图 14、不同价格个券转股溢价率走势(%)
金融
2025-05-07
来源:金融工程定期报告:转债市场债性为主,反弹力度弱于权益
查看原文
图 12、跌幅前 5 个券与正股涨跌幅对比
金融
2025-05-07
来源:金融工程定期报告:转债市场债性为主,反弹力度弱于权益
查看原文
图 9、不同规模转债指数近一年累计涨跌幅 图 10、不同策略转债指数近一年累计涨跌幅
金融
2025-05-07
来源:金融工程定期报告:转债市场债性为主,反弹力度弱于权益
查看原文
图 7、不同信用评级转债近一年累计涨跌幅 图 8、不同价格转债指数近一年累计涨跌幅
金融
2025-05-07
来源:金融工程定期报告:转债市场债性为主,反弹力度弱于权益
查看原文
表 2、近一周可转债个券跌幅 TOP 5
金融
2025-05-07
来源:金融工程定期报告:转债市场债性为主,反弹力度弱于权益
查看原文
回顶部
报告群
公众号
小程序
在线客服
收起