彼得森经济研究所-供应链是否带来了疫情时期的通货膨胀?(英)-16份

1750 Massachusetts Avenue, NW | Washington, DC 20036-1903 USA | +1.202.328.9000 | www.piie.comPOLICY BRIEFPhil Levy is a lead trade economist at the World Bank. He was previously chief economist at Flexport, a logistics startup. Prior to that, among other roles, he taught at Yale, Columbia, and Northwestern Universities and was senior economist for trade in President George W. Bush’s Council of Economic Advisers. 24-10 Did Supply Chains Deliver Pandemic-Era Inflation?Phil LevyOctober 2024Note: The views expressed in this paper are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of the World Bank or its Board of Directors. This Policy Brief is part of a series titled Understanding COVID Era Inflation. PIIE gratefully acknowledges the financial support from a donor who wishes to remain anonymous for the research presented in this Policy Brief. The research was conducted independently; funders are never given the right to review a publication before its release.INTRODUCTIONThe question of whether supply chain breakdowns were a significant cause of pandemic-era inflation has drawn attention, both in terms of supply chain resilience and macroeconomic policy. In the former case, if supply chain breakdowns drove inflation, that might strengthen the argument for capacity expansion, reshoring, or other remediation. In the latter case, if supply chains were not the cause, then one must look more vigorously at other potential explanations, such as monetary or fiscal policy. This Policy Brief argues that supply chain breakdowns were not a principal cause of the inflation of recent years. The allegation that they were is a compound claim that goes as follows: (1) supply chains did not perform as they ought to; and (2) that failure was an important cause of inflation. The claim helped spur serious efforts through legislation, regulation, and executive branch action to push for “resilient” supply chains, where resilience presumably means the ability to handle a similar shock with significantly less disruption. I largely focus on US trade in containerized goods and shows that, within months of the pandemic’s onset, the quantities of goods delivered increased significantly. These real increases were seen in broad categories such as overall imports of goods, flow of goods through ocean ports, and in personal consumption expenditures on durable and nondurable goods. They were also mirrored in more disaggregated categories. There were increases relative to both prepandemic levels and trend lines. Both shipping and consumption of goods were well above levels that might reasonably have been anticipated from prepandemic data. 2 PB 24-10 | OCTOBER 2024None of this is to deny the sharp increases in inflation, the price of shipping, and the accompanying delays and empty shelves. Average times for moving container cargo from Asia to North America went from roughly 1.5 months prepandemic to almost 4 months in early 2022. Shipping prices also rose dramaticall

立即下载
综合
2024-10-14
16页
0.74M
收藏
分享

彼得森经济研究所-供应链是否带来了疫情时期的通货膨胀?(英)-16份,点击即可下载。报告格式为PDF,大小0.74M,页数16页,欢迎下载。

本报告共16页,只提供前10页预览,清晰完整版报告请下载后查看,喜欢就下载吧!
立即下载
本报告共16页,只提供前10页预览,清晰完整版报告请下载后查看,喜欢就下载吧!
立即下载
水滴研报所有报告均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
相关图表
创新型重点行业转型挂钩指标参考
综合
2024-10-14
来源:三、转型挂钩指标设计
查看原文
基础型重点行业转型挂钩指标参考
综合
2024-10-14
来源:三、转型挂钩指标设计
查看原文
转型融资客户初筛参考表
综合
2024-10-14
来源:四、转型客户筛选与工具创新
查看原文
近期表现突出的事件组合超额净值曲线图
综合
2024-10-14
来源:事件跟踪月报(2024年10月):关注股权激励类事件
查看原文
近一年事件组合超额收益(相对中证 1000)
综合
2024-10-14
来源:事件跟踪月报(2024年10月):关注股权激励类事件
查看原文
近一年事件组合超额收益(相对中证 500)
综合
2024-10-14
来源:事件跟踪月报(2024年10月):关注股权激励类事件
查看原文
回顶部
报告群
公众号
小程序
在线客服
收起