Morgan Stanley Fixed-China Economics Bull vs. Bear Social Dynamics Indicator an...-110407692

M IdeaChina Economics | Asia PacificBull vs. Bear: Social Dynamics Indicator and Policy Tipping Point Morgan Stanley Asia LimitedRobin XingChief China Economist Robin.Xing@morganstanley.com +852 2848-6511 Jenny Zheng, CFAEconomist Jenny.L.Zheng@morganstanley.com +852 3963-4015 Zhipeng CaiEconomist Zhipeng.Cai@morganstanley.com +852 2239-7820 Harry ZhaoEconomist Harry.Zhao@morganstanley.com +852 2239-7229 We believe Beijing is slowly shifting policy to support social welfare and housing, but that the pace will be gradual: Our proprietary Social Dynamics Indicator has deteriorated but not yet reached the previous thresholds seen in late 2022 or late 2015, when an outright policy pivot took place. To bring you a variety of perspectives, we have picked several charts that consider both bull and bear arguments for China's economy: • Bull arguments: Both auto and home appliance sales picked up with the rollout of consumer goods trade-in program. Pace of govt. bond issuance accelerated from Aug, and the annual quota can be used up by Oct if the current speed can be maintained, opening the possibility of supplementary budget in late Oct NPC Standing Committee meeting. • Bear arguments: While we believe Beijing will gradually shift towards supporting social welfare and housing with fiscal policy, perceptions of social risks may prompt more decisive policy pivot, given policymakers’ focus on social stability. Thus, we launch the Social Dynamics Indicator, which aims to gauge social impact of economic performance and identify potential thresholds for policy tipping point – It has deteriorated from 2Q but has not reached the previous thresholds seen in 2H22 (prolonged Covid lockdowns) or late 2015 (4th year into PPI deflation), when an outright policy pivot took place. Evident of this, PBoC unexpectedly held off a rate cut following the Fed's 50bps rate cut, probably on concern at still large US-China rate differentials and bank profit margin, and we expect only 20bps of cuts in 4Q24.For important disclosures, refer to the Disclosure Section, located at the end of this report.September 20, 2024 09:52 AM GMTM Idea2Bull ArgumentsM IdeaMorgan Stanley Research3Incrementally Faster Fiscal RolloutThe pace of govt. bond issuance accelerated in August, with net monthly financing amount hitting a two-year high of Rmb1.6trn in August (18% of annual quota). If govt. bond issuance can be sustained at August's pace, the remaining annual quota (~33%) could be used up by October, opening up the possibility of a supplementary budget. Meanwhile, YoY home appliance sales turned positive in August (3.4% vs. -2.4% in July), and that of CPCA auto volume sales hit a 10-month high of 18% in September. MTD, likely reflecting the accelerated rollout of consumer goods trade-in program. Source: CEIC, Wind, Morgan Stanley Research0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNet Govt. Bond Issuance (% Share of Annual Quota)20232024Annual Quota Usage by

立即下载
金融
2024-09-30
Morgan Stanley
10页
0.68M
收藏
分享

[Morgan Stanley]:Morgan Stanley Fixed-China Economics Bull vs. Bear Social Dynamics Indicator an...-110407692,点击即可下载。报告格式为PDF,大小0.68M,页数10页,欢迎下载。

本报告共10页,只提供前10页预览,清晰完整版报告请下载后查看,喜欢就下载吧!
立即下载
本报告共10页,只提供前10页预览,清晰完整版报告请下载后查看,喜欢就下载吧!
立即下载
水滴研报所有报告均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
相关图表
分机构托管规模变化:证券公司(亿元) 图23:分机构托管规模变化:信用社(亿元)
金融
2024-09-30
来源:2024年8月中债登和上清所托管数据:广义基金整体减配,商业银行大幅增持利率债
查看原文
分机构托管规模变化:境外机构(亿元) 图21:分机构托管规模变化:保险机构(亿元)
金融
2024-09-30
来源:2024年8月中债登和上清所托管数据:广义基金整体减配,商业银行大幅增持利率债
查看原文
分机构托管规模变化:商业银行(亿元) 图19:分机构托管规模变化:广义基金(亿元)
金融
2024-09-30
来源:2024年8月中债登和上清所托管数据:广义基金整体减配,商业银行大幅增持利率债
查看原文
分券种托管规模变化:同业存单(亿元) 图17:不同机构托管占比变化:同业存单
金融
2024-09-30
来源:2024年8月中债登和上清所托管数据:广义基金整体减配,商业银行大幅增持利率债
查看原文
分券种托管规模变化:超短融(亿元) 图15:不同机构托管占比变化:超短融
金融
2024-09-30
来源:2024年8月中债登和上清所托管数据:广义基金整体减配,商业银行大幅增持利率债
查看原文
分券种托管规模变化:短融(亿元) 图13:不同机构托管占比变化:短融
金融
2024-09-30
来源:2024年8月中债登和上清所托管数据:广义基金整体减配,商业银行大幅增持利率债
查看原文
回顶部
报告群
公众号
小程序
在线客服
收起